Remediation Review
|
|
In view of the seriousness of situations involving remediation, the CHRD faculty members have established this process: |
|
Step 1.
|
A faculty member will raise the concern pertaining to the student during the student-review conference or directly to the Department Chair. The faculty and/or Chair will discuss options in executive session of the student review conference, to determine if a formal individualized written plan of action is necessary.
|
|
Step 2.
|
The nature of the problem and the formal individualized plan for addressing the problem (including recommended remedial assistance as needed) are written and discussed with the student to ensure mutual understanding.
|
|
Step 3.
|
If the student agrees to the written plan, it is then placed in the student’s departmental and graduate file. In some cases, the student may be asked to take a leave of absence from the program or to terminate involvement with the program. In all formal individualized written plans, the Department Chair and the Dean of the Graduate School are informed, and due process is observed to protect student rights and University responsibilities.
If the student does not agree with the formal individualized written plan, or has disagreement over the nature of the problem, he/she may follow the standard grievance process within the College of Education and Counseling or the Graduate School.
|
|
Step 4.
|
Once the plan has been successfully completed, a formal document stating that the student has fully complied with the remediation plan and is considered in “good standing” in the program will be written and placed in the student’s departmental and graduate file. If the student does not successfully address the items specified in the remediation plan he or she will be advised to leave the program.
|
Text Only Version | Accessibility Problems?
